A proof of the Edwards–Walsh resolution theorem without Edwards–Walsh CW-complexes

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Another proof of Banaschewski's surjection theorem

We present a new proof of Banaschewski's theorem stating that the completion lift of a uniform surjection is a surjection. The new procedure allows to extend the fact (and, similarly, the related theorem on closed uniform sublocales of complete uniform frames) to quasi-uniformities ("not necessarily symmetric uniformities"). Further, we show how a (regular) Cauchy point on a closed uniform subl...

متن کامل

A new proof for the Banach-Zarecki theorem: A light on integrability and continuity

To demonstrate more visibly the close relation between thecontinuity and integrability, a new proof for the Banach-Zareckitheorem is presented on the basis of the Radon-Nikodym theoremwhich emphasizes on measure-type properties of the Lebesgueintegral. The Banach-Zarecki theorem says that a real-valuedfunction $F$ is absolutely continuous on a finite closed intervalif and only if it is continuo...

متن کامل

Products of Cw-complexes

We show that Liu's characterization for the product K x L to be a CW-complex is independent of the usual axioms of set theory.

متن کامل

CW - complexes Stephen

The term CW-complex comes from “closure-finite with the weak topology”, where “closure-finite” refers to A3 and “weak topology” refers to A4. A finite complex is a CW-complex with only finitely many cells. Observe that if X is a finite complex, A4 is redundant, since W is the union of the compact sets φα((φ n α) −1W ), and these are closed since X is Hausdorff. If X has cells of dimension n but...

متن کامل

Proof of Theorem A

Since the full proof of this theorem 10] is simple yet quite tedious, we connne ourselves to the guidelines of the proof. Observing the angles between the three sample points s i ; s j ; s k forming the minimal angle and the corresponding VD vertex v, we take advantage of the fact that d(v; s i) < d(s i ; s k) (Theorem 4.2(ii)) and, by trigonometric arguments, show that sin sin(120) R M

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Topology and its Applications

سال: 2012

ISSN: 0166-8641

DOI: 10.1016/j.topol.2012.07.013